What is a “Favorable Finding” for VA Disability Claims?

Looking for Expert-Level VA Claim Help?📱Call Us Now! 737-295-2226

When it comes to VA disability claims, particularly understanding your VA rating decision letter, knowing the meaning of a “favorable finding” is super important.

According to 38 CFR § 3.104(c), a favorable finding refers to a conclusion on a question of fact or the application of law to facts made by an adjudicator concerning the issues under review.

These findings are binding on all subsequent VA claims adjudicators (VA raters, also known as RVSRs) unless rebutted by evidence identifying a clear and unmistakable error.

Summary of Key Points

• Definition of a “Favorable Finding” for a VA Claim: A favorable finding in a VA rating decision letter refers to a conclusion made by an adjudicator on a question of fact or the application of law to facts concerning the issues under review, as defined in 38 CFR § 3.104(c).

• Types of VA Favorable Findings: Favorable findings can include establishment of a current disability, in-service occurrence or aggravation, nexus between military service and current disability, verification of a valid stressor event for PTSD, and more.

• Binding Nature of Favorable Findings: Once a favorable finding is made, it becomes binding on all future adjudicators within the VA, including the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, unless there is clear and unmistakable evidence of an error in the original finding.

• Implications for Veterans: Favorable findings serve as foundational elements in a veteran’s claim, streamlining the adjudication process and ensuring consistency and fairness. However, favorable findings do not guarantee a VA claim approval, and all required elements must be satisfied for a VA claim approval.

What is a Favorable Finding for VA Claims?

As defined in 38 CFR 3.104(c), a favorable finding means a conclusion either on a question of fact or on an application of law to facts made by an adjudicator concerning the issue(s) under review.

Pro Tip: A favorable finding does not mean your VA claim was approved. In fact, your VA claim might have been denied even though the VA rater made one or more favorable findings, such as evidence of a current disability.

References:

• Findings of fact and conclusions of law in VA claims, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart ii, 1.A, and

• Addressing favorable findings, see M21-1, Part X, Subpart ii, 1.A.2.

Types of Favorable Findings for VA Disability

A favorable finding in a VA rating decision letter indicates that the VA has positively determined one or more elements of your claim.

Here are some of the possibilities:

Establishment of a Current Disability

• Explanation: This finding confirms that the veteran has a current, diagnosable medical condition. It establishes the first essential element required for VA claim approval.

• Example: The VA recognizes a diagnosis of degenerative disc disease based on VA medical records submitted with the claim.

In-Service Occurrence or Aggravation

• Explanation: Evidence shows that the disability either began or was aggravated during active military service. This finding validates the connection between military service and the current disability.

• Example: A veteran submits service treatment records showing treatment for a knee injury sustained during a training exercise with multiple witnesses.

“Nexus” Between Military Service and Current Disability

• Explanation: A favorable nexus statement confirms that a medical provider has found a connection between the veteran’s current disability and an in-service event, injury, disease, or illness.

• Example: A Nexus Letter states that the veteran’s chronic migraines are “at least as likely as not” related to repeated concussions suffered during a deployment to Afghanistan.

Verification of a Valid Stressor Event for PTSD

• Explanation: The VA accepts the occurrence of a traumatic stressor event as credible for PTSD claims. This finding supports service connection for PTSD.

• Example: The VA determines that a combat veteran’s stressor event (exposure to hostile fire), is corroborated by unit records as well as the veteran’s DD 214 and military decorations.

Current Severity of Symptoms

• Explanation: The VA identifies that the veteran has provided sufficient evidence detailing the severity and impact of their symptoms, which is crucial for assigning the correct VA rating percentage.

• Example: A C&P examiner documents that the veteran’s back pain results in daily chronic pain, limited mobility, and the inability to sit or stand for extended periods.

Proof of Presumptive Service Connection

• Explanation: The VA finds that the veteran’s condition qualifies for presumptive service connection based on specific criteria, such as exposure to Agent Orange or burn pits.

• Example: The VA acknowledges that a Vietnam veteran’s diagnosis of ischemic heart disease is presumptively service-connected due to herbicide exposure.

Continuous Symptomatology

• Explanation: The VA determines that the veteran’s condition has been consistently present since service, even if there was a gap in treatment.

• Example: A veteran submits lay evidence demonstrating chronic knee pain since discharge, bridging a gap in documented medical treatment.

Competent and Credible Lay Evidence

• Explanation: The VA accepts statements from the veteran or first-hand witnesses as positive evidence of symptoms or events supporting service connection for VA disability benefits.

• Example: A buddy statement confirms the veteran injured their shoulder during a military training exercise, aligning with the veteran’s claim.

Secondary Service Connection

• Explanation: The VA finds that a condition meets the requirements for secondary service connection to an already service-connected disability rated at 0% or higher.

• Example: A veteran’s knee injury is found to be “proximately due to or aggravated by” gait abnormalities resulting from service-connected lower back pain.

Aggravation of a Pre-Existing Condition

• Explanation: The VA determines that military service aggravated a pre-existing disability, qualifying it for service connection.

• Example: A veteran’s pre-existing asthma worsened significantly during service, beyond its natural progression, as documented in service treatment records.

Qualification for Special Monthly Compensation (SMC)

• Explanation: The VA identifies eligibility for SMC due to a veteran’s service-connected Erectile Dysfunction (ED).

• Example: A veteran with ED is determined to be eligible for SMC-K due to the loss of use of a creative organ.

Evidence of Chronicity for Presumptive Conditions

• Explanation: The VA identifies that the veteran’s condition falls under a presumptive list and that symptoms have been chronic and manifest to a compensable degree within the presumptive period.

• Example: A Gulf War veteran’s diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome is presumed service-connected under 38 CFR § 3.317.

Binding Nature of Favorable Findings

Once a favorable finding is made, it becomes binding on all future adjudicators within the VA, including the Board of Veterans’ Appeals.

This means that these findings cannot be overturned or ignored in subsequent decisions unless there is clear and unmistakable evidence of an error in the original finding.

Implications for Veterans and Their VA Claims

For veterans, favorable findings serve as foundational elements in their claims.

These determinations can streamline the adjudication process, as certain aspects of the claim are already established and accepted.

However, it’s essential to understand that while favorable findings are binding, they do not guarantee the approval of a claim.

All required elements in The Caluza Triangle must be satisfied for a VA claim approval.

Example Scenario

Consider a veteran who files a VA claim for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

The VA rater makes the following favorable findings in the award decision:

• Current Diagnosis: The veteran has a current diagnosis of PTSD.

• In-Service Stressor: There is credible evidence of an in-service stressor event from a combat deployment.

These favorable findings mean that any future adjudicator reviewing the case must accept these conclusions as established facts unless there is clear and unmistakable evidence of an error.

This binding nature ensures consistency and fairness in the adjudication process.

All future claims related to PTSD must include these positive findings.

Want Expert-Level Help with Your VA Disability Claim? WE GOT YOUR SIX!

How does VA Claims Insider help veterans?

We make the confusing and frustrating VA claim process EASY through our 8-step proprietary system and one-on-one coaching; we’re the VA Claim EXPERTS you can trust, and YOU are never alone in this fight against the VA!

You’ll also receive VA disability expert Brian Reese’s SEM Method Blueprint—a proven formula that has helped over 25,000 veterans win their VA disability claims faster:

Strategy + Education + Medical Evidence = VA Rating and Compensation You Deserve FASTER!

Start today and unlock an exceptional level of service you deserve for serving our country:

➡️ You’ll hear from a VA Claim Expert over email within 15 minutes of signing up today.

➡️ You’ll hear from your Veteran Coach team within 24 hours of all inquiries during normal business days/hours.

➡️ Our terms are clear and simple: If we don’t win, you don’t pay. You have nothing to lose and everything to gain.

Click the red button below to start the process of winning your VA claim right now!

Fellow Veterans: Are You Ready to WIN, SERVICE-CONNECT, and INCREASE Your VA Rating FASTER? We Can Help!

• VA Claims Insider is the #1 most trusted name in VA disability claims.

• Work directly with a VA claims coach who can help lead you to VA claim victory.

• 25,000+ disabled veterans served in our membership programs since 2016.

• 30% average rating increase for veterans who complete our #1 rated Elite program.

• 4.7/5.0 average rating out of 5,500+ total reviews; over 4,500 5-star reviews.

About the Author